= Сообщение: 6332 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Shaun Buzza 1:229/110 12 Mar 22 12:15:43 Кому : Andre Robitaille 12 Mar 22 12:15:43 Тема : Re: 2022 FTSC Standing Member Election - Votes Received FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:229/110+7bb756fe На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=3855.fidonet_ftscpubl@1:154/70+269207af = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== ============================================================================== AR> What Shaun is describing is called an "absolute majority," where the AR> 'yes' votes need to be one more than half of the eligible voters.
More or less. I was calling it a "majority decision", but that's what I had in mind, at least one more 'yes' (or 'no') than half of all votes.
AR> There is only a single reference that I can find in the FidoNet Policy AR> about needing an absolute majority, and that's the Zone Coordinator AR> election. Other than that, all voting mechanics are extremely vague.
Yes, extremely vague indeed! This ambiguity is what caused me to start this whole discussion in the first place!
AR> And FWIW, that document has been in effect for thirty years and FidoNet AR> is still here.
I wouldn't expect Fidonet to immediately implode if that document were to be changed, either. After all, we have seen our Election Coordinator blatantly ignore that document once already, in this very election.
