Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Apr 24 01:17:44, всего сообщений: 7124
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 6930 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Andrew Leary                     1:320/219          08 Oct 23 03:00:51
Кому : deon                                                08 Oct 23 03:00:51
Тема : Question on FTS-0001
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:320/219@fidonet+652256f9
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=3155.fdn_ftscpubl@3:633/509+29876dae
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ==================================
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=3157.fdn_ftscpubl@3:633/509+2987c861
==============================================================================
Hello deon!

08 Oct 23 15:08, you wrote to all:

de> I have a user who is having trouble importing echomail mail from
de> clrghouz (my mailer/tosser) using BBBS (other users appear to not be
de> affected).

de> In FTS-0001, section C.1 regarding a packed message, it states:

de>       PakdMessage  = 02H 00H           (* message type, old type-1
de> obsolete *)
de>                      origNode          (* of message *)
de>                      destNode          (* of message *)
de>                      origNet           (* of message *)
de>                      destNet           (* of message *)

de> So assume this scenario, an echomail message originates from node 1/1,
de> and is sent to it's hub 2/2. The hub then sends the message onto node
de> 3/3.

de> When the hub (2/2) exports and packs the message for 3/3, is the
de> "origNode", "origNet" 2 (for the hub), or 1 (because that is where the
de> message originated from).

de> From my testing, I think both at least hpt and mbse use 2 for the
de> origNode/origNet - but FTSC says "of message", which I originally
de> interpretted that it needed to be "1" since the "message" originated
de> from 1/1.

de> It also says this "Due to routing, the origin and destination net and
de> node of a packet are often quite different from those of the messages
de> within it", which would be true for netmail, but is it also true for
de> echomail?

It can be.  In the early days of FidoNet, it was quite possible for a node to
participate in echomail conferences via routed mail.  In this scenario,
echomail is simply netmail with an AREA: line.

de> Have I missed an FTSC document that states echomail should use the
de> hub's details?

Take a look at FTS-0004.001 for more information on this; it's available at
http://ftsc.org/docs/fts-0004.001 ...

Andrew

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20230826
* Origin: From the Desk of the FTSC Administrator (1:320/219)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.040847 секунды