Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Apr 24 01:17:44, всего сообщений: 7124
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 4106 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : mark lewis                       1:3634/12.73       09 Dec 18 14:33:36
Кому : Markus Reschke                                      09 Dec 18 14:33:36
Тема : What would YOU do?
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:3634/12.73+5c0d6e15
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:240/1661+5bfd8f7b
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP437 ==================================
==============================================================================

 On 2018 Dec 09 19:04:02, you wrote to Carol Shenkenberger:

CS>> Not if we align them.  Take what is in existing use, see what the
CS>> differences are, then what tools already use them and see what works.

MR> The FTSC documented one:
MR> - if there's an address in the IBN flag use that one and only that one

the phrase "only that one" does not appear in FTS-5001.006... yes, if there's a domain attached to the IBN flag, use it...

i think that the two examples given using two of the same flag should be expanded to show how to use two or more other flags with attached domains as well... i don't understand why this is so hard...

MR> - if the IBN flag doesn't include an address take all the addresses
MR> from all INA flags

yes...

MR> The undocumented standard:
MR> - take all addresses in IBN and INA flags

that's not undocumented... if there are domains listed on the flags, they are all taken and considered for the final output... the decision making tree for that is different for different mailers... some are protocol oriented, some do not recognise INA, some use INA as well as the domains attached to other flags...

MR> Q: How ports are handled by the undocumented standard? If we have
MR> INA:my-bbs.ddns.org and IBN:my-bbs.dyndns.com:8080 for example, does the
MR> port number also apply the the address in the INA flag?

CS>> This isn't a really common thing to see (a site with 2 lookup
CS>> addresses).  I'd say most of us with 2 have a reason for it.  Mine is
CS>> backup connectivity for the most part.  I've had one or the other go
CS>> off for a bit and with the game league (Battlenet) that can get nasty
CS>> fast.

MR> Over here most of the distribution nodes have several FQDNs for resilience.
MR> If one dyn-DNS service fails the node is still reachable via its second
MR> FQDN.

that's exactly what xxcarol is doing with her INA/IBN entries...

)\/(ark

Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it wrong...
... My kid wanted a watch for Christmas, so we let him.
---
* Origin:  (1:3634/12.73)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.034797 секунды