Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Apr 24 01:17:44, всего сообщений: 7124
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 6333 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Dan Clough                       1:123/115          12 Mar 22 11:18:00
Кому : Shaun Buzza                                         12 Mar 22 11:18:00
Тема : Re: 2022 FTSC Standing Member Election - Votes Received
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2586.fido_ftscpubl@1:123/115+26921834
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:229/110+4fc0e740
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ==================================
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:229/110+d1e7666e
==============================================================================
-=> Shaun Buzza wrote to Dan Clough <=-

DC> Well, in effect it would be, sort of.  But, that wasn't the point.  I
DC> was debating your claim that in real-world politics, "no" votes and
DC> abstentions are counted.  They are not, because there *ARE* no "no"
DC> votes.  When I look at my election ballot, I can choose to vote for
DC> *ONE* candidate, which is a "yes" vote.  There is no choice to pencil in
DC> for a "no" vote.

SB> Realistically, one could vote for both candidates, or otherwise
SB> invalidate the ballot card, which would be considered a 'spoilt
SB> vote', or essentially an abstention. I know, I'm picking nits
SB> here, but I did find reference to specifically this while doing
SB> my due diligence on the word 'abstention':

SB> "In another manner, an intentionally spoilt vote could be
SB> interpreted as an active abstention. An intentionally spoilt vote
SB> is caused by a voter who turns to an election and invalidates the
SB> ballot paper in some way."

SB> [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstention]

While this is probably true, it is also irrelevant to the discussion at
hand.  Again, on a real-world ballot, there is not a place to vote "NO".

Disclaimer:  The above refers to voting for candidates for an elected
position.  I do realize that sometimes ballots contain yes/no votes for
things like referendums or propositions.  There, that should save you
some time...  ;-)


... A woman drove me to drink, and I never had the courtesy to thank her.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.040263 секунды