= Сообщение: 5931 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Björn Felten 2:203/2 04 Feb 22 03:54:18 Кому : Rob Swindell 04 Feb 22 03:54:18 Тема : MSGID FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:203/2+61fc9552 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=31387.ftsc_pub@1:103/705+26624172 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP437 ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=31389.ftsc_pub@1:103/705+26624fd6 ============================================================================== RS>>> If you send a netmail there, it'll reach me. But that clause is only a RS>>> "should" anyway. It doesn't *have* to be a valid return address for the RS>>> originating network.
>> Says who?
RS> Says FTS-0009.001:
RS> "The originating address should be specified in a form that RS> constitutes a valid return address for the originating network."
I was more thinking about how you interpret "should" to "yeah, fuck that, it actually doesn't say I *have* to, so I ignore that totally, they probably just added the "should" for fun".
..
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125 * Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)
