FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC


	Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.

FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC

Введите FGHI ссылку:

Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Apr 24 01:17:44, всего сообщений: 7124

Ответить на сообщение

К списку сообщений

Предыдущее сообщение

Следующее сообщение

= Сообщение: 6252 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : BjЎrn Felten                     2:203/2            07 Mar 22 16:19:23
Кому : Wilfred van Velzen                                  07 Mar 22 16:19:23
Тема : 2022 FTSC Standing Member Election - Votes Received
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:203/2+62262278
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/464+6226140c
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ==================================
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/464+62262556
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:3634/12.73+6227423a
==============================================================================
BF>> X-JAM-PATH2D: 313/41 240/1120 301/1 280/464 203/0 2

WvV> There is nothing wrong with this path, and you got it. The problem is
WvV> Andrew didn't get it.

   Rest assured, I'm not trying to point finger at anyone, I'm only curious. Every message I get from Andrew is the same:

X-JAM-PATH2D: 320/219 203/0 2

   And almost the same from every other Fidoweb connected system, like e.g. yours:

X-JAM-PATH2D: 280/464 203/0 2

   So why does Helmut's path look like the above?

   And the same for a Z1 node like Dan's:

X-JAM-PATH2D: 123/115 3634/12 240/1120 301/1 280/464 203/0 2

   Why didn't I get that directly from Andrew?

   Then we have the messages from Terry from down under:

X-JAM-PATH2D: 640/1321 1384 221/1 203/0 2

   Yes, Tommi is often the fastest system in the Fidoweb, so no surprise that I get the message the fastest from his system. But I got it.

   So, somewhere in our Fidoweb there seem to be a system that adds s-b lines without being properly connected to our Fidoweb. And the only new links I can find in any of the path lines I have looked upon is:

    -> 240/1120 -> 301/1

   Usually it works, sometimes it does not?

   Well, I guess only Andrew can properly investigate the reason that he did not receive this (for once) important message. Maybe that intermediate 240/1120 system is one of those rabid NAB systems, that refuse to handle the Fidoweb properly?

..

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

К главной странице гейта