Dec 06 10:58 2018, Fred Riccio wrote to Michiel van der Vlist:
FR> Jerry Schwartz's Perl script is probably the most popular extraction FR> tool used to generate this file. Up until July of this year a file FR> created by this script was hatched into the I-BinkD file echo.
FR> Carol's entry in that extraction of NodeList.224 is...
This is what I've meant with the confusion about which "standard" applies. Apparently Jerry's converter follows the undocumented feature Carol mentioned. So it would extract additional addresses which aren't intended for binkp for a node entry following the FTSC docs (if listed take just the address in the IBN flag). How do we resolve this dilemma? If all entries for Z1 nodes follow the undocumented feature then I could add a special case to my tool to take also the addresses listed in the INA flag. And Jerry would have to do the same, just the other way around. The frustating thing is that it's hard for software developers to know about undocumented features. Please tell the FTSC about such stuff, so we are able to document that.
