= Сообщение: 4042 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Markus Reschke 2:240/1661 06 Dec 18 21:54:20 Кому : Fred Riccio 06 Dec 18 21:54:20 Тема : FTS-5001 FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:240/1661+5bfd8f73 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:132/174+5c093da2 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN1 ================================= ============================================================================== Hi Fred!
Dec 06 15:13 2018, Fred Riccio wrote to Markus Reschke:
MR>> I did comparisons with the output of other tools. The funny thing was MR>> that my tool extracted more binkp nodes. There are nodes with MR>> addresses hidden in the system name or telephone number, the DO4 user MR>> flag and more. Besides checking the FTSC docs I had to figure out MR>> what else is hidden in the nodelist.
FR> It sounds like you have a problem. If you are looking for BinkP FR> nodes, you should ONLY be checking for an IBN flag (with or without a FR> host name). The addresses "hidden" in other places could be for some FR> other protocol.
... or for binkp. ;) We have several entries in the nodelist which aren't following standards. Some nodes forgot to update their entries when new flags, like IBN, were added. Or they apply their own undocumented standards. When writing a conversion tool for binkp you have to find all the oddities besides what's in the FTSC docs. Or you cling on the FTSC standards and miss some nodes.
The idea of standards is to agree on a common set of rules, a specific syntax and what have you to build compatible systems. If people add new things without consulting the standards comitee they might break the compatibility with other systems. Unfortunately this happens all the time because someone thinks he has the best idea since sliced bread, and the other parties have to find workarounds or other solutions to keep their systems somewhat compatible. It gives you a nice headache every time.
