Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.

	Введите FGHI ссылку: Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Apr 24 01:17:44, всего сообщений: 7124 Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение = Сообщение: 6253 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От   : Wilfred van Velzen               2:280/464          07 Mar 22 16:31:33 Кому : BjЎrn Felten                                        07 Mar 22 16:31:33 Тема : Re: 2022 FTSC Standing Member Election - Votes Received FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/464+62262556 На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:203/2+62262278 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ================================== ============================================================================== Hi BjЎrn, On 2022-03-07 16:19:23, you wrote to me: BF>>> X-JAM-PATH2D: 313/41 240/1120 301/1 280/464 203/0 2 WvV>> There is nothing wrong with this path, and you got it. The problem is WvV>> Andrew didn't get it. BF>    Rest assured, I'm not trying to point finger at anyone, I'm only BF> curious. Every message I get from Andrew is the same: BF> X-JAM-PATH2D: 320/219 203/0 2 BF>    And almost the same from every other Fidoweb connected system, like e.g. BF> yours: BF> X-JAM-PATH2D: 280/464 203/0 2 BF>    So why does Helmut's path look like the above? What do Helmut's path have to do with Andrew's or mine? (If Helmut isn't directly connected to you, that is.) BF>    And the same for a Z1 node like Dan's: BF> X-JAM-PATH2D: 123/115 3634/12 240/1120 301/1 280/464 203/0 2 BF>    Why didn't I get that directly from Andrew? It was a message from a random Z1 system, why would you get that from Andrew (it could, but it doesn't have to). BF>    Then we have the messages from Terry from down under: BF> X-JAM-PATH2D: 640/1321 1384 221/1 203/0 2 BF>    Yes, Tommi is often the fastest system in the Fidoweb, so no surprise BF> that I get the message the fastest from his system. But I got it. BF>    So, somewhere in our Fidoweb there seem to be a system that adds s-b BF> lines without being properly connected to our Fidoweb. I have yet to see any evidence of that! So that conclusion is very premature. BF> Well, I guess only Andrew can properly investigate the reason that he BF> did not receive this (for once) important message. Maybe that BF> intermediate 240/1120 system is one of those rabid NAB systems, that BF> refuse to handle the Fidoweb properly? That is Ulrich Schroeter, he has one of the most reliable systems out there! Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) К главной странице гейта

Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.038970 секунды