Nope. We went through this before and you were given the chance to prove it back then and you fumbled the ball.
As far as I am aware there were only two Russian sysops at the time who were capable but both of them were still posting either straight ascii or cp866. As for me most of my MSGs are not only capable but most actually contain utf-8 characters, while some are straight ascii and a few are cp866 lately. I am able to find credible witnesses to back my statement up. I have seen nothing from you other than extremely dubious claims.
MvdV> So Tom Jennings was the first.
Nope. utf-8 didn't even exist then or at least not officially. Also your posted history falsely credits MS as a (the?) source which further raises doubts about the validity of any claim on this particular subject.
Life is good, Maurice
... Ne do ðu nauðer: ne ðe sylfne ne here, ne ðe sylfne ne leah. Don't do either of these things: praise yourself or criticise yourself. --- GNU bash, version 5.1.4(1)-release (x86_64-motorshed-linux-gnu) * Origin: Little Mikey's EuroPoint - Ladysmith BC, Canada (2:280/464.113)
