Ol>> Why is the FTSC unable to publish an FTS for the packet format(s) in Ol>> use for decades?
WvV> A couple of years back there was someone who put together a document WvV> describing the different pkt formats in use. It was discussed here, but I WvV> don't know what happend to it, because the name it was given:
Good work by Stephen (and feedback from mark lewis). It's sad that it didn't get published.
I think I found one omission: The value from "month" in the Type 2(+) packet header is "0-11 for Jan-Dec" (in contrast to 1-31 for "day" of month). This isn't mentioned in Stephen's draft.