Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Apr 24 01:17:44, всего сообщений: 7124
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 2303 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Kees van Eeten                   2:280/5003.4       30 Jan 17 19:47:04
Кому : mark lewis                                          30 Jan 17 19:47:04
Тема : FSP-1040.001 Draft #3
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5003.4+588f8f2e
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:3634/12.73+588f73e5
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN-1 ================================
==============================================================================
Hello mark!

30 Jan 17 12:09, you wrote to me:

KE>> You cannot change the document because the past is wrong in your/our
KE>> current view.

ml> someone needs to explain this to the FTSC, then... it seems that my
ml> attempts have all been failures... there's been a lot of rope given,
ml> though...

 Maybe they will read the above, especially now with your underscore added.

 I do not know if you can adress FTSC. The FTSC is formed by a number of
 well meaning volunteers, who all think that they can contribute to the
 documentation of Fidonet standards. I expect, that those willing to take
 a lead, have the best chance to get their view of the situation
 documented. But I also believe that a majority of members must agree on
 a document, to have it declared as a standard.

 So to get your ideas accepted, you will have to approach individuals in
 such a way, that they are not directly forced into a defence.

 That at least would be my approach.

KE>> Programmers are stubborn people with strong opinions on how things
KE>> should be done. The documentation should keep them at bay to ensure
KE>> interconnectivity.

ml> agreed... and when you get folks, even some FTSC members, grabbing
ml> internet RFCs and using them to beat other FTSC members and FTN
ml> programmers about the head and ears, then why can't they be used FTN
ml> standards and proposals...

 Ones opinions are based on experiences from the past. When your past has a
 strong adherence to RFC's in it, one is bound to stick to that.
 It is just a Pavlov reaction in fear of a spanking or possibly getting a
 cookie.

Kees

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
* Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.034395 секунды