= Сообщение: 17 из 7124 ======================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 15 Sep 13 10:51:30 Кому : Benny Pedersen 15 Sep 13 10:51:30 Тема : IPv6 addresses in nodelist FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+52357514 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:230/0+52350bf2 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ================================== ============================================================================== Hello Benny,
On Sunday September 15 2013 01:26, you wrote to me:
MV>>>> Oops! That should be: IBN:[1:2:3:4::8]:24555 MV>>>> Address before port number. BP>>> this kills ipv4, MvdV>> How so?
BP> use hostname in nodelist does not kills anything
True, but not an answer to my question.
BP> using ip in nodelist kills ipv4 or ipv6, and should be avoided to BP> support /etc/gai.conf :)
Someone asked something like: "how do I avoid the problem of the dual use of the colon when entering a literal IPv6 address in the nodelist"? And the anser was "encase it in square brackets".
This method is FTSC complient. That using a hostname instead is better, is an opinion.
BP>>> but who cares ? :=)
MvdV>> Running servers from home using IPv4 will come to an end anyway MvdV>> when ISPs start deploying CGNAT. :-(
BP> amen, ipv6 have being in way over 15 years here in danmark, and you BP> think tomorrow it happens ?
Not tomorrow, but maybe next year. Mobile ISP'are already deploying CGNAT. Thinking that "fixed line" ISP's will continue to issue globally unique IPv4 addresses to consumers forever is putting your head in the sand.
