= Сообщение: 2316 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 31 Jan 17 14:52:45 Кому : Nicholas Boel 31 Jan 17 14:52:45 Тема : FSP-1040.001 Draft #3 FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+5890988d На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:154/10+588faa23 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:154/10+58909d4f ============================================================================== Hello Nicholas,
On Monday January 30 2017 15:03, you wrote to me:
MV>> Twist it any way you want, 24 for the hour and 60 for the minutes MV>> and seconds is NOT Fidonet current practise. And will never be MV>> compatible with Fidonet current practise.
NB> As far as I can tell, everything in the unmodified "Draft #3" I posted NB> covers everything in FTS-0001 and then some. So I would say "current NB> practice" is being documented for both backwards AND forwards NB> compatibility.
One can propose anything one wants. If someone insist on submitting a proposal where it is proposed that pi shall be treated as equal to three in Fidonet, the FTSC will not refuse it.
But as I already wrote, there is a difference between a proposal and a standard. FTSC standards should be written on the basis of "if you do it like this, it will work". A proposal to threat pi as three or allowing "24" for the hour field, will never be promoted to a standard since it violates the above basic rule.
