On Saturday December 01 2018 21:25, you wrote to me:
CS>>> Actually, Andrew and all running, woould you allow a personal CS>>> issue to intrupt the smooth operation of the FTSC?
CS> Note the question was to them.
The question was to "Andrew and all running". You are running, you are part of "them". So now I am asking you.
MV>> So... Suppose an invited guest brings a personal issue into the MV>> members only FTSC echo and refuses your request to drop it. How would MV>> you deal with that interuption of the smooth operation of the FTSC?
CS> My actions would have been very different from yours.
Of course. Predicting the past is easy. My way of dealing with an invited guest digging up a personal issue and thereby disrupting the smooth operation of the FTSC obviously failed. Repeating a strategy that failed would be pretty stupid. But I am not a candidate, you are. So I am asking /you/. How would /you/ handle the presumed situation? You said you would not allow a personal issue to disrupt the smooth operation of the FTSC, but you have not answered the question of /HOW/ you would deal with it. So I ask you again:
Suppose an invited guest brings a personal issue into the members only FTSC echo and refuses your request to drop it. How would you deal with that disruption of the smooth operation of the FTSC?
CS> It turns out later you failed due dilligence to notify the new Z1C CS> that they had guest access
Just FYI: Technically, he was invited. The door of my areamanger was unlocked. All he had to do was open it and enter.
CS> which has since been repaired. I could be you felt that was not your CS> job to notify them. I feel it was
Now that you bring it up, what do you think IS the job of the FTSC administrator? Do you know where it is documented? Can you tell me what the job desciption of the FTSC administrator says about invited guests? In casu: can you point me to the part where it says that it is the job of the FTSC administrator to take initiative in sending invitations to new invited guests?
