MV>> Can you tell us according to what part(s) of which FTSC MV>> standard(s) this nodelist entry contains information that is MV>> never used by a properly configured mailer?
FAIL.
From FTS-5001.006:
INA This flag sets a default server address used for any Internet Protocol Flag that does not specify its own.
So, a properly configured binkp mailer will see that the IBN flag carries a server address. It will use that and nothing alse to connect. A binkp mailer will NOT look at the INA flag since that is to be used for any other protocol who's flag has no server address of its own. But there are no other IP protocol flags. So no mailer will ever use the server address from the INA flag. The INA flag is dead wood. It is "unreachable code".
CS> What standards do you show to represent when a site has 2 resolving CS> addresses, one preferred for IBN but the other for everything? Z1 CS> practical resolution, yet another thing not documented.
It /IS/ documented. FTS-5001.006:
Multihomed systems ------------------
Multihomed systems or systems that are otherwise reacheable by more than one address, may - instead of adding another A or AAAA record to the DNS zone of the host name - repeat the flag(s) carrying the address with another address.
