On Tuesday December 04 2018 21:18, you wrote to me:
MV>> The question was to "Andrew and all running". You are running, MV>> you are part of "them". So now I am asking you.
CS> Ok, but you should ask them as well, not just me.
You were the one bringing "personal issue" into the discussion. So I am asking you.
MV>>>> So... Suppose an invited guest brings a personal issue into the MV>>>> members only FTSC echo and refuses your request to drop it. How MV>>>> would you deal with that interuption of the smooth operation of MV>>>> the FTSC?
CS> I have dealt with similar over the decades. The frst was Cott Lang CS> (original Regade author) then many tothers, including some very CS> intersting ones when election coodinator for FN_SYSOP and some not CS> well behaved people.
I specifically asked about the private FTSC echo. It is different from most other echos as it is a members and invited guests only echo.
MV>> Suppose an invited guest brings a personal issue into the members MV>> only FTSC echo and refuses your request to drop it. How would you MV>> deal with
CS> Best I can see is you accused Ward of being something like an infamous CS> African dictator and he objected.
Really? Did you actually see me use the word "dictator" in public or is your judgement based on hearsay? Whatever happened, it was not me that brought the alleged personal issue into th eprivate FTSC aera.
Anyway, I did not ask how you think I should have handled it. I am not a candidate. You are, so I am asking you how YOU would handle it.
CS> I would have taken that offline and worked it out.
How would you do that? "take it offline"? It takes two to tango. How do you do that if the party concerns refuses to cooperate in "taking it offline"?
