= Сообщение: 7014 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 02 Jan 24 16:58:33 Кому : deon 02 Jan 24 16:58:33 Тема : FSP-10xx-1: BBSID Kludge Specification FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+659432aa На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=3233.fdn_ftscpubl@3:633/509+29f94fee = Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF-8 ================================== ============================================================================== Hello deon,
On Wednesday January 03 2024 00:19, you wrote to me:
>> Has it occured to you that listing in a different way in different >> networks is because they do /not want/ to be correlated across >> networks?
de> I have.
OK, as long as you keep that in mind...
de> But the differences that I was referring to are what I would put in de> the category of spelling mistakes, locations specifics or format de> errors.
de> EG: In the case of one sysop, their BBS is listed as "United_States", de> "Bendigo_Vic", "Bendigo_AUS" and "Bendigo_VIC_AUS". I've seen some de> examples with Sysop names as well, normally those with Mac... Mc... or de> their name (or their BBS name) has an apostrophe that is listed in one de> nodelist and omitted in another.
The Mac vs Mc and the missing apostrophe might be a typo but it could just as well be an attempt to derail "correlation robots".
There are reasons for the existance of othernets and ever so often it has to do with a dislike for "Fidonet...
