CS> With me out of the picture, there is a query on a Sean vote? I don't CS> know what is going on there.
You and I know Sean Dennis sent-in a vote, you and I know it wasn't counted, you and know it isn't even mentioned.
My guess is it was a timing problem, too late, but it should have been reported. Since it wasn't, it cast a shadow over this election. the question then follows "How many other votes were not counted and for which reason?"
This election is tainted and there should be a re-run.
CS> So my proposal is if any FTSC member feels we need a runoff, we keep it CS> short and sweet. It can be unfair to MVDL to drag it too long.
A run-off isn't needed but a re-vote from scratch with the same candidates, c'mon Carol ...
- The voting has been compromised, whether or not it changes the outcome is IMO irrelvant - A vote went lost/unreported. What happened to that vote and why? - The provisional winner has lobbied to have a particular vote-enumerator - The vote-enumerator defends the outcome of the vote of which the winner is the one who pushed to have that particular enumerator - The vote-enumerator ruling on hmself?
Before anyone climbs in their pen ... did you hear me say anything fishy happened? No you did not, I'm merely stating a veil was cast over this election and a re-run would be appropriate.
And I still think we have a right to learn who did not vote, it wouldn't change the outcome of the election either ... but it would the next-one.
\%/@rd
--- D'Bridge 3.99 SR40 * Origin: The best gold is at the bottom of barrels of crap (2:292/854)
