Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Apr 24 01:17:44, всего сообщений: 7124
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 3872 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Ward Dossche                     2:292/854          13 Nov 18 13:23:23
Кому : All                                                 13 Nov 18 13:23:23
Тема : Ideas for a new standard dealing with nodenumber uniformity
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:292/854+0e1b2239
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ==================================
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:261/1466.0+5bebb4f8
==============================================================================
I would like the FTSC to discuss some standard dealing with zone-independent node-numbers and other special technical entries in the nodelist.
 
For years for example when the FTSC-administrator was based in zone-2, he/she had the number "20", i.e. 2:2/20. This was never agreed upon throughout the different zones, but I think it would make sense in that spirit, if the next FTSC-administrator would be from another zone, he/she also would carry the same z:z/20 AKA.
 
Expanding from there, we have to deal with the nodenumber of the Fidonews editor which was determined by the powers-that-be when they drafted P4 in their infinite wisdom, decided it should be 1:1/1 never thinking a Fidonews-editor could be from a different zone.
 
*****************************************************************************
1.3  Definitions
 
1.3.1  FidoNews
 
Contributions are submitted to node 1:1/1; a file describing the format to be used is available from 1:1/1 and many other systems.
*****************************************************************************
 
In the meantime there are several examples.
 
I think the FTSC could recommend that the Fidonews-editor is always z:z/z.
 
Even more expanding ... there are the numbers which have been used, without agreement, for
 
z:z/1000  IC
z:z/1001  Echolist coordinator
z:z/1002  fidonet.org administrator
z:z/1003  Zone pointlistkeeper
 
Where appropriate, it can be mentioned only one of these can be had in the entire world nodelist.
 
Maybe the FTSC could also bring some uniformity in the /99 /999 /9999 new node application forest.
 
There probably other suggestions possible in this area.
 
Ideas welcome.
 
 \%/@rd

--- D'Bridge 3.99 SR33
* Origin: A man's most proud moment is when he takes a shit (2:292/854)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.037564 секунды