= Сообщение: 4649 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Richard Menedetter 2:310/31 15 Apr 19 08:38:18 Кому : Paul Hayton 15 Apr 19 08:38:18 Тема : Perceptions FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:310/31+5cb42e36 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=3:770/100+44cfc355 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN1 ================================= ============================================================================== Hi Paul!
12 Apr 2019 22:24, from Paul Hayton -> Richard Menedetter:
PH> But treating each other with consideration and respect is equally PH> important in my view.
I agree. But from my point of view this includes fact based debate. Taking the time and doing a fact based debate is a sign of respect, not disrespect!
PH> It's been nearly a year since you opted to delist so I completely PH> understand how your perceptions would not have changed.
I 100% agree that my point of view is old. And furthermore that FSXNet managed to gather a huge following, and that this means that many people feel "at home" there. I am just saying that back when I left it was not for me any more. It was drifting "the wrong way" for me. And after a large portion of discussion in the general area revolved around Mystic BBS, albeit there existing FSX_Mystic and FSX_BBS, I had to have the insight that this is not for me any longer. This is nothing bad, it was just not the right way for ME, that is all.
PH> You're not active in the community anymore nor the new echo areas PH> available and/or discussions and support for other BBS software taking PH> place etc.
I am more than willing to try it again, if that is OK for you, and if I can unsubscribe from BBS areas, and if that means that the topic in the remaining areas is not BBS. Like subsidiarity. If there is a specialzed area for a topic, discuss it there.
PH> Mystic BBS may have it's bugs
I wholeheartedly agree ;) Especially as it tries to do everything, instead of focusing on a specialized areas.
PH> (like other software)
No. Other software is much more tested, and is NOT shared in a completely buggy and dangerous way with the public.
I remember a version that was freely distributed that mixed the kludges of one message with the text of another. That is a bug that would be visible after minimal testing. The mere fact that that buggy version was offered for download is still shocking to me.
PH> I fear your encounters with him may have led you to become quite jaded PH> about all things Mystic but at least you were 'warm' for a while. PH> But at what cost?
What cost do you mean? I have no issues as long as a software does not hinder the operation of the network. I have unsubscribed any BBS related area, simply because I am not interested in that topic the slightest. If BBS is left, I am very happy to go right.
PH> I guess it all depends on each persons point of view and their PH> perception of what they take in.
Correct :) Like everything in life.
CU, Ricsi
... They've turned off the Christmas carols. It's safe to come out now. --- GoldED+/LNX * Origin: I was going to procrastinate, but I put it off. (2:310/31)
