FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC


	Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.

FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC

Введите FGHI ссылку:

Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Apr 24 01:17:44, всего сообщений: 7124

Ответить на сообщение

К списку сообщений

Предыдущее сообщение

Следующее сообщение

= Сообщение: 5260 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Nil Alexandrov                   2:5015/46          24 Oct 20 18:00:32
Кому : Michiel van der Vlist                               24 Oct 20 18:00:32
Тема : Nodelist Thoughts?
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:5015/46+5f9443eb
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+5f93e006
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ==================================
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:292/854+1a243a32
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/464.47+5f95775c
==============================================================================
Hello, Michiel!

Saturday October 24 2020 09:59, from Michiel van der Vlist -> Nil Alexandrov:

NA>> It is that the IBN flag cannot include the host address itself,
NA>> that is why we usually have a combination of INA+IBN in the
NA>> nodelist.

MV> Wrong.

You are right. I have checked the FTS-5001 http://ftsc.org/docs/fts-5001.006 and these are examples

Example: IBN:host1.example1.tld,IBN:host2.example2.tld
Or:      INA:host1.example1.tld,INA:host2.example2.tld,IBN

MV> IBN:fido.vlist.eu  or  IBN:f5556.vlist.eu:24555 is perfectly valid.
MV> This is shorter than using the INA,IBN combination.

The idea behind is that the node answers on INA defined hostname with different IBN/IFC/.. protocols. It is not that different protocols are served from different machines usually, so the hostname will be mentioned only once.

You can think of it in the following way: INA is the phone number and IBN/IFC/.. is the V32/V42/..

MV> Using the INA flag for the host addess is shorter when there are
MV> multiple protocol flags.

What if a node only supports BinkP protocol? Probably, a single IBN record can hold the hostname itself without additional INA flag, but it would be easier to add a new protocol flag in future.

MV> INA:fido.vlist.eu,IBN,ITN is fine as well.
MV> It is all documented in FTS-5001.

Agreed.

Best Regards, Nil
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
* Origin: -=NIL BBS=- (2:5015/46)

К главной странице гейта