= Сообщение: 4846 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Rob Swindell 1:103/705 25 Aug 19 17:11:07 Кому : Ward Dossche 25 Aug 19 17:11:07 Тема : Re: Max subject length: 71 or 72 chars? FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=30300.ftsc_pub@1:103/705+21c8cff7 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:292/854+032c393e = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:292/854+1243294d ============================================================================== Re: Re: Max subject length: 71 or 72 chars? By: Ward Dossche to Rob Swindell on Mon Aug 26 2019 01:53 am
> Hi Rob, > > RS> But again, it should be made clear that the "72 bytes" here includes the > RS> required null terminator, so a message subject is in fact limited to a > RS> maxmimum length of 71 characters. > > From my point of view you were cherry-picking, probably involuntary, from > sections B1 and C1.
I'm pointing out the issues with the "subject" definition. Did you want me to quote the entire spec?
> They're 2 different kinds of beast.
If you eliminate or ignore the "Stored Message" definition from the spec, then it would be less contradictory. I also think the Stored Message definition doesn't really belong in the same spec as the packet definition.
> And do you also know where the "71" comes from ?
Well, I took 72 and subtracted 1 (for the required null byte). I assume the 72 came from 36 (the total length of the to and from fields) multiplied by 2. Is there some other significance of 71 that I'm not aware of? --- SBBSecho 3.09-Linux * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
