= Сообщение: 5325 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Rob Swindell 1:103/705 19 Dec 20 12:05:02 Кому : Maurice Kinal 19 Dec 20 12:05:02 Тема : alternative DateTime (ref: fts-0001.016) FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=30779.ftsc_pub@1:103/705+24440b29 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:153/7001+5fddc190 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:153/7001+5fde69b9 ============================================================================== Re: alternative DateTime (ref: fts-0001.016) By: Maurice Kinal to Rob Swindell on Sat Dec 19 2020 09:02 am
> Hey Rob! > > RS> SBBSecho defaults to exporting type 2+ packets > > Okay I had a looksee at a pktheader parser I wrote awhile back and I now see > that I was confusing 2+ with 2.2 so your statement above would put SBBSecho > amongst the majority.
Earlier you stated "Most are 2.2 only and don't even know it.", so even allowing that you confused 2+ with 2.2, that's still not true of SBBSecho.
> All my links support type 2+ pkts while only one > supports type 2, while another can do 2.2. So from my perspective both 2 > and 2.2 are equally rare.
The term "support" and "do" here are rather vague: those terms could refer to the production of packets of a particular type, the consumption of packets of a particular type, or a combination.
> RS> FidoNet (collectively) is vehemently opposed to anything that is > RS> not interoperable with FidoNet software from the 80's or 90's. > > I wish I could say that them were the days but my heart wouldn't be in it. > Everyone I knew from that time is no longer in the game and whatever > software they were using back then has long since been abandoned even before > y2k and the two digit year became real issues of concern. I am convinced > that had the four digit year replaced the packed msg DateTime back in 1999 > or 2002 there would have been minimal problems with it.
<shrugs> If a new date/time format can be introduced in a backward-compatible manner, that's how it should be done, IMHO. And FidoNet should use an existing standard this time, stop making up new (badly defined) ones. --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
