> Hey Rob! > > RS> If a new date/time format can be introduced in a > RS> backward-compatible manner, that's how it should be done, IMHO. > > That is exactly what my proposal attempts to do. It works within the > confines of an already existing string without modification of the structure > of the well defined header.
Your proposal is not backwards compatible.
> RS> And FidoNet should use an existing standard this time, stop > RS> making up new (badly defined) ones. > > It isn't badly defined.
I did not mean to imply I was referring to your proposal - I was not. I was referring to the badly defined specs published by the FTSC over the past 30+ years. --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
