= Сообщение: 5336 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Rob Swindell 1:103/705 19 Dec 20 16:17:07 Кому : Maurice Kinal 19 Dec 20 16:17:07 Тема : alternative DateTime (ref: fts-0001.016) FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=30790.ftsc_pub@1:103/705+24444649 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:153/7001+5fde8c17 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:153/7001+5fdea033 ============================================================================== Re: alternative DateTime (ref: fts-0001.016) By: Maurice Kinal to Rob Swindell on Sat Dec 19 2020 11:26 pm
> Hey Rob! > > RS> Your proposal is not backwards compatible. > > My best guess is that any application that cannot handle the four digit year > deserves to die a horrible death if it hasn't already. My proposal would > have worked just as well back in 1995 as it does today without any > alteration.
Which is to say: it would not work at all, in a backwards compatible way.
> RS> I was referring to the badly defined specs published by the FTSC > RS> over the past 30+ years. > > If so then perhaps there should be more proposals such as mine in order to > correct the wrongs. I have plans on continuing depending on the outcome of > this particular proposal. How about you?
Continuing what?
> Too bad it didn't happen 20 years ago when it *should* have but it has to > start somewhere and near as I can figure I am doing the exact right thing. > If you can come up with something better I am all ears and am more than > willing to cede. Until then my proposal stands as is.
The something better is a new control paragraph which includes a complete unambiguous date/time stamp in a standard format. I'm pretty sure I stated so in my first reply to this topic. --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
