= Сообщение: 5505 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Rob Swindell 1:103/705 13 Feb 21 11:59:48 Кому : Maurice Kinal 13 Feb 21 11:59:48 Тема : "Packet Type 2 Compatible Formats" (Ex FSP-1040) FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=30959.ftsc_pub@1:103/705+248ddea3 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:153/7001+6027dd02 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== ============================================================================== Re: "Packet Type 2 Compatible Formats" (Ex FSP-1040) By: Maurice Kinal to Oli on Sat Feb 13 2021 02:06 pm
> -={ 2021-02-13 14:06:58.413218119+00:00 }=- > > Hey Oli! > > O> I think I found one omission: The value from "month" in the Type > O> 2(+) packet header is "0-11 for Jan-Dec" (in contrast to 1-31 for > O> "day" of month). This isn't mentioned in Stephen's draft. > > I believe that is a consequence of time.h and has nothing to do with > fidonet. It is all in the localtime() structure that 0-11 for months was > used rather than the 01-12 used for months in strftime() which is also part > of time.h. According to c89 standards output for strftime does include > enough % specifiers to output proper iso-8601 or even a rfc-3339 formatted > datetime stamp. For sure "2021-02-13 14:06:58 +0000" is doable and is > backwards compatible to c89. We could have been using a four digit year > since day one.
The month field being discussed here is from the packet header, which is binary (not a string of text). The date field you're referring to is in a "packed message" header. The *year* field of the packet header is already 16-bits, so can already accomodate years up to 65535. --- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
