FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Apr 24 01:17:44, всего сообщений: 7124
= Сообщение: 5726 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От : Rob Swindell 1:103/705 17 Apr 21 18:38:44
Кому : Michiel van der Vlist 17 Apr 21 18:38:44
Тема : FTS-xxxx.001 PING and TRACE flags
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=31180.ftsc_pub@1:103/705+24e13d70
На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+607b3d0b
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ==================================
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:320/219@fidonet+607bc91e
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+607c00d9
==============================================================================
Re: FTS-xxxx.001 PING and TRACE flags
By: Michiel van der Vlist to All on Sat Apr 17 2021 09:54 pm
> in FTS-5001.006, the PING functionality contains two parts. PING and
> TRACE. According to that specification systems flying the PING flag
Make that: "two parts: PING and TRACE."
> argue that current practise is that TRACE functionality is optional.
Alternate spelling of "practice" there.
> current practise works well, but that it is not complient with the
^^^^^^^^^ spelling
> Making the TRACE function optional by seperating the flags, is an
^^^^^^^^^^ spelling
> TRACE functionality for later or ommit it completely without
^^^^^ spelling
> that do not support TRACE need do nothing, They are complient
caps ^ ^^^^^^^^^ spelling
> complient with the new specs, it just does not advertise all
^^^^^^^^^ spelling
What's the FTSC documentation standard regarding grammar and spelling?
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
|
К главной странице гейта
| 
