= Сообщение: 5932 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Rob Swindell 1:103/705 03 Feb 22 19:36:25 Кому : Björn Felten 03 Feb 22 19:36:25 Тема : MSGID FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=31389.ftsc_pub@1:103/705+26624fd6 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:203/2+61fc9552 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP437 ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:203/2+61fcb230 ============================================================================== Re: MSGID By: Björn Felten to Rob Swindell on Fri Feb 04 2022 03:54 am
> RS>>> If you send a netmail there, it'll reach me. But that clause is only > a > RS>>> "should" anyway. It doesn't *have* to be a valid return address for > the > RS>>> originating network. > > >> Says who? > > RS> Says FTS-0009.001: > > RS> "The originating address should be specified in a form that > RS> constitutes a valid return address for the originating network." > > I was more thinking about how you interpret "should" to "yeah, fuck that, > it actually doesn't say I *have* to, so I ignore that totally, they probably > just added the "should" for fun".
In the language of technical specifications there is a firm differentiation between "should" (or "may") and "shall" (or "must"). The use of the word "should" is deliberate and not "just added for fun".
http://ftsc.org/docs/fta-1006.002 defines "SHOULD" to "mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular item, but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a different course."
I'll leave it to the original poster to fully understand the implications before choosing their course. I was just providing my own insight. -- digital man (rob)
This Is Spinal Tap quote #25: Viv Savage: Have... a good... time... all the time. That's my philosophy. Norco, CA WX: 57.4°F, 22.0% humidity, 0 mph ENE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
