Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Apr 24 01:17:44, всего сообщений: 7124
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 6142 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Rob Swindell                     1:103/705          22 Feb 22 14:40:36
Кому : Tim Schattkowsky                                    22 Feb 22 14:40:36
Тема : Re^2:  Directly include binary data in messages
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=31605.ftsc_pub@1:103/705+267b17d9
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:240/1120.29+39484084
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP437 ==================================
==============================================================================
  Re: Re^2:  Directly include binary data in messages
  By: Tim Schattkowsky to Rob Swindell on Tue Feb 22 2022 09:55 pm

> //Hello Rob,//
>
> on *22.02.22* at *19:22:28* You wrote in Area *FTSC_PUBLIC*
> to *Anna Christina Nass* about *"Re: Directly include binary data in
> messages"*.
>
>  RS> Pretty trivial. In fact, any echomail program that supports multiple
>  RS> packet formats (e.g. SBBSecho supports packet types 2.0, 2+, 2e, and
>  RS> 2.2) can be used as a gateway between old and even older technology
>  RS> systems. :-)
>
> IMHO this is lacking the total system perspective. There are open questions
> at that level. How is the sending system supposed to know what packet format
> a receiver expects?

In SBBSecho, each link can be configured with a preferred packet format. Of course, that only works for explicitly-configured links. Otherwise, it just defaults to stone-age type 2 packet generation.

> This could be done in a lot of ways:
> - explicit configuration
> - nodelist flags
> - dynamically during the mail session (i.e., the mailer eventually triggers
> the final packet format in some way depending on session handshake
> information)
> - ...
>
> The most important question for me is still, WHY is there any need for a new
> packet format? Other than the lack of zone (or even 5D) information, what
> are the points?

<shrug> I'm not saying there is a need. I can theorize packet and packed-message header improvements all day long, but I don't know if that means there's a factual "need".
--
                                            digital man (rob)

Sling Blade quote #19:
Doyle: I can't so much as drink a damn glass of water around a midget
Norco, CA WX: 53.5°F, 66.0% humidity, 5 mph SSE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.046122 секунды