= Сообщение: 5503 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : andrew clarke 3:633/267 14 Feb 21 05:48:46 Кому : Oli 14 Feb 21 05:48:46 Тема : Future of ftsc.org web site FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=3:633/267+6028229b На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/464.47+6027f974 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN1 ================================= ============================================================================== 13 Feb 21 17:08, you wrote to me:
Ol> If you compare all three, Gitlab and Github is very similar and Ol> Sourceforge the horrible mess. I'm not very deep into Gitlab or Github, Ol> but my impression is that since Microsoft bought Github they have added Ol> features to the free plan, that had only been available in the free Ol> Gitlab plan before. The biggest advantage of Gitlab is that is open Ol> source (if you really want to install it on your own server). It also Ol> has a better search. Overall I find Github a bit easier to use. They are Ol> both equally good options.
Ultimately it doesn't really matter as long as a decision is made and the repo works.
If Microsoft happens to screw up GitHub 10 years from now then that's not a huge deal for most people.
Though somehow I don't see the FTSC having much to do by 2031.
I don't really see Microsoft messing up GitHub as it would create a lot of ill-will towards open source developers, including their own employees, but in any case it's usually fairly trivial to move most smaller repos elsewhere, especially something small and relatively static like the FTSC docs. And in the unlikely event a decent free alternative is unavailable, self-hosting is an option.
--- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20180707 * Origin: Blizzard of Ozz, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (3:633/267)
