Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции FTSC_PUBLIC с датами от 13 Sep 13 18:57:24 до 01 Apr 24 01:17:44, всего сообщений: 7124
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 4049 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC =
От   : Carol Shenkenberger              1:275/100          06 Dec 18 20:43:39
Кому : Michiel van der Vlist                               06 Dec 18 20:43:39
Тема : Candidates vision request
FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=6866.ftsc_pub@1:275/100+206f211d
На   : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+5c0867da
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ==================================
Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:280/5555+5c0a3f4c
==============================================================================
  Re: Candidates vision request
  By: Michiel van der Vlist to Carol Shenkenberger on Thu Dec 06 2018 01:00 am

MV>>> If elected, Will you lead by example and upgrade your system so
MV>>> that your binkp server is connectable via IPv6?

CS>> Ths is not an available service in my area unless going commercial
CS>> connectivity at *significant* cost.  Initial foray locally showed
CS>> close to 1,000$ a month but I can see that is breaking free in some
CS>> areas here (USA/Canada).  The time is not yet here but we have
CS>> pockets of it.  For now, no, I do not have that much money a month
CS>> to go commercial.

MV> I take that as a "no".

I do not thnk ANYONE here is going to spend the costs for commercial links of
te local area.  It will come, but is not here yet.

MV> Question:

MV> Are you aware that to help out those that can not get native IPv6 from
MV> there own ISP, there are providers that offer a so called "tunnel service"
MV> for free? Can you name one of hem?

Yes several.  They are posted in the Fidonews.  I can not get native IPV6 here
yet at a reasonable cost and that is true of much of Z1. There it no gain in a
tunnel of IPV6 to an IPV4 setup.

What I hope is the next FTSC chair thinks to ask about such availabilty before
assuming 'just tunnel it' works.

Do we even have IPV6 in Z4?  I do not know what they have access to it at all.
Eventually we all will, but it will take time.

   xxcarol

 
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32
* Origin: SHENK'S EXPRESS telnet://shenks.synchro.net (1:275/100)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.036651 секунды