= Сообщение: 4113 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Carol Shenkenberger 1:275/100 09 Dec 18 15:16:52 Кому : Markus Reschke 09 Dec 18 15:16:52 Тема : Candidates vision request FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=6928.ftsc_pub@1:275/100+2072c944 На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=2:240/1661+5bfd8f7c = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== ============================================================================== Re: Candidates vision request By: Markus Reschke to mark lewis on Sun Dec 09 2018 07:19 pm
MR> It seems that you have misunderstood me completely. I was not talking MR> about that nodes with multiple FQDNs aren't standard. We are discussing MR> the way multiple FQDNs are listed in the nodelist. Carol told me Z1 puts MR> the FQDNs in the IBN and INA flags, i.e. both should be used. The MR> documented way is to use either multiple INA flags or multiple IBN flags MR> based on the specific situation.
Mistranslation. I said both *can* be used, not should. Most people have only 1 FQDN/ aka look up address for a protocol. When we do see a site with multiples, then the rules are a bit vague.
