= Сообщение: 4127 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Carol Shenkenberger 1:275/100 10 Dec 18 17:35:54 Кому : mark lewis 10 Dec 18 17:35:54 Тема : What would YOU do? FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=6944.ftsc_pub@1:275/100+20743b6a На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:3634/12.73+5c0e8384 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== Ответ: area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=1:3634/12.73+5c0fd953 ============================================================================== Re: What would YOU do? By: mark lewis to Carol Shenkenberger on Mon Dec 10 2018 10:13 am
CS>> It could be the wording is bad.
ML> agreed...
CS>> When it was written, the FTSC meant is there was an address on IBN, CS>> it would priority over the INA address. If no address on IBN, it CS>> would use INA. If only a port on IBN, use INA but the port on IBN.
ML> and if there is INA and IBN both with domains, use the IBN domain first ML> and then the INA one... if the IBN contains a port number, use it for ML> both...
I belive the intent was for 2 different domains in that scenerio (like mine). I suspect if IBN had a port number and INA didn't then the port number should only be used with that domain. I need to go back and read the relevant documents to see how that was handled and if it was clear.
ML> PS: i've just sent you a direct netmail from this point. i watched it get ML> delivered and am writing this just as a "head's up! please check your ML> netmail or unsecure inbound."... it is a message forwarded from the mystic ML> echo that was written back in july 2018...
Ok, will look for it. THats just before I joined zone21 where I get most of my mystic information.
