DC> You don't think there needs to be a deadline for submission of DC> votes? How else can an election be conducted?
PQ> Check the echo again. R57C's vote was sent at his post PQ> "3:770/100 a31c39a2 dated Sun, 3 Mar 2019 21:28:23 +1300" PQ> (unfortunately addressed to 'All'). I.e. in plenty of time to PQ> arrive before the deadline. It was ignored by the Election PQ> Coordinator.
Yes, OK, I see that now. The only response there is to that is that the vote was not cast properly (the addressing).
PQ> So, R57C corrected himself with the later post with the proper PQ> addressee which was deemed too late to be accepted. Where is the PQ> justice in that?
This "re-vote" was indeed (not "deemed") cast too late as per the published deadline. I agree that it's kind of a bad deal, but...
The good news is that the vote in question would not have changed the outcome in any way.
Thanks for pointing out that the original vote (although not meeting the requested criteria) was submitted on time. I had missed that, and apologize if I came across a little harshly. Didn't mean to do that, just didn't realize the full story here.
PQ> Cheers, PQ> Paul.
Cheers!
... A day without sunshine is like night. === MultiMail/Linux v0.51 --- SBBSecho 3.06-Linux * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)
