= Сообщение: 5405 из 7124 ====================================== FTSC_PUBLIC = От : Carol Shenkenberger 1:275/100 30 Jan 21 14:00:56 Кому : August Abolins 30 Jan 21 14:00:56 Тема : Re: Fidonet Reference Library(FSC's) FGHI : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=7671.ftsc_pub@1:275/100+247b00df На : area://FTSC_PUBLIC?msgid=177.fido-ftscpubl@1:153/757.2+245c8eb2 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== ============================================================================== Re: Re: Fidonet Reference Library(FSC's) By: August Abolins to Carol Shenkenberger on Thu Jan 07 2021 10:50 am
> > > 'In use enough' means a lot more than 2 systems. > > Yeah. But "what if" there were at most 3 systems/mailers (and the rest user > in the world - one for each main zone? ;) > > Technically, they could implement all the proposals and that would be their > standard - and as long those things don't break some of the older systems > should a 4th want to come onboard, then who is to say they are not following > standards? ;) > > > > You and Stas have something unique. There is no reason to not make a > > proposal on how it operates. > > That would probably take place far from now. But currently it is just a toss > project that complies to existing FTN standards. The Telegram "app" is not > modified. But maybe in the future someone could build a version that featur > things like taglines, quoting options, etc.. > > > > ..In ASIAN_LINK there is a discussion you are in > > relating to cell phones and SD cards. An example of a 3rd party utility > > following relevant portions of a 'standard' to inter-operate with TELEGRA > > would be a case of that if it allowed for use of SIM card storage (or > > pluggin mini-pin external HD?) to store a bigger backlog of messages than > > their own device could handle. > > Correct. Better "offline" capability would be interesting. That could break > that advantage of portability though. But right now, the build-in S)earch o > the current app is pretty good - as long as one is still connected online. > > > > All I really know about TELEGRAM is it works and I have all the same > > moderator controls as expected. Including to remove a user if they prove > > problematic (which none have been). To me, it's a unique OLR type setup. > > Not really different from using Bluewave etc. on the end seen from others > > Nice job! > > Thank for saying that. I am not sure if the developer follows this echo, bu > I'll forward your sentiments.
I still need to add in your echos. They should be on but not configured.
