Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции IPV6
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции IPV6 с датами от 31 Jul 11 14:37:00 до 01 Apr 24 00:03:00, всего сообщений: 7402
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 6527 из 7402 ============================================= IPV6 =
От   : Tony Langdon                     3:633/410          31 Jan 21 19:01:00
Кому : Victor Sudakov                                      31 Jan 21 19:01:00
Тема : Re: Down Temporarily
FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=1671.fido-ipv6@3:633/410+247bb59b
На   : area://IPV6?msgid=2:5005/49+601639c2
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ==================================
Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:5005/49+60168ef4
==============================================================================
-=> On 01-31-21 11:53, Victor Sudakov wrote to Jay Harris <=-

VS> I have been always of the opinion that port forwarding is never needed
VS> in IPv6 because no NAT is ever involved (and port forwarding is part of
VS> the destination NAT technology). If you had IPv6 port forwarding (in
VS> the IPv4 way) on some device, please surprise me!

Some consumer routers mislabel IPb6 firewall opening as "port forwarding", mine
included.  Mine came with all inblund IPv6 traffic blocked by default (good!),
but to open a port to a specific host, I have to go into "IPv6 port forwarding"
(sic) and specify the port(s) that I want to open and the interface host ID
(last 64 bits of the IPv6 address) to allow traffic for.  Or I can specify that
host as an "exposed host", which of course, disables the firewall for that
specific IPv6 address.

VS> It is also difficult to believe that a fancy router does not have a
VS> built-in IPv6 firewall (if a firewall is meant by "port opening").

One would hope it does, and that there's a mechanism to open ports to specific
hosts in the firewal config.

VS> My home MikroTik hAP ac3 does not support NAT or port forwarding in
VS> IPv6 (which is expected) but has a nice IPv6 stateful firewall with
VS> connection tracking (in fact it's iptables inside). I have eventually
VS> moved all my IPv6 tunneling to MikroTik and I'm very happy about it's
VS> performance.

My router does speak of IPv6 port forwarding, but it's actually controlling the
firewall's packet filter.  


... Is fire supposed to shoot out of it like that!?
=== MultiMail/Win v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
* Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.050441 секунды