= Сообщение: 6821 из 7402 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Brian Rogers 1:142/103 12 Oct 21 13:31:00 Кому : Paul Hayton 12 Oct 21 13:31:00 Тема : Re: UFW and he.net FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=191.fidonet_ipv6@1:142/103+25cafe84 На : area://IPV6?msgid=3:770/100+31122f42 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=3:770/100+7eb00b37 ============================================================================== -=> Paul Hayton wrote to Tommi Koivula <=-
PH> On 11 Oct 2021 at 08:43p, Tommi Koivula pondered and said...
TK> His tunnel is working, he can make outbound connections. So the protocal TK> 41 is open to the tunnel endpoint computer. (PI).
PH> I can also ping the Debian box via the Pi endpoint tunnel using IPv6... PH> so I figure things must almost be working as I can reach the system PH> from the internet via IPv6 and the tunnel using ping
Question: Is one native IPv6 and the other endpoint a 6-to-4 tunnel? This *may* be an issue. Using IPv4 as a test would help. I know natively on my access node I can not ssh to it using it's tunneled IPs because the MTU doesn't match. If I use a direct IP connection there's no issues at all... and again the MTU matches at 1500 not 1480 as a tunneled link would. Could this perhaps be an issue? Just thinking out loud :)
... MultiMail, the new multi-platform, multi-format offline reader! --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52 * Origin: SBBS - Carnage! 2001:470:8a1e::3 (1:142/103)
