Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции IPV6
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции IPV6 с датами от 31 Jul 11 14:37:00 до 01 Apr 24 00:03:00, всего сообщений: 7402
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 6885 из 7402 ============================================= IPV6 =
От   : Scott Street                     1:266/420          24 Oct 21 11:23:02
Кому : Victor Sudakov                                      24 Oct 21 11:23:02
Тема : A small questionary on ISPs
FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=1:266/420+617581ae
На   : area://IPV6?msgid=2:5005/49+6174fdcc
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: UTF8 ===================================
Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+61769f62
==============================================================================
Hello Victor!

24 Oct 21 13:26, you wrote to me:


SS>>>>     inet6 2601:48:c500:9340::c0e3 prefixlen 60 dynamic
VS>>> This is very interesting. Why "prefixlen 60" on the LAN?

VS> Whatever Comcast's intentions, are you sure that a LAN with a
VS> prefixlen different from /64 will work properly? Will a non-standard
VS> prefix not break SLAAC and other things?

VS> This is where my theoretical knowledge is lacking, but I've always
VS> been warned against using anything different from /64 on a LAN
VS> segment.

The gateway and my dozen+ devices do not seem to have any issues getting dynamic IPv6 addresses, and since most are Apple, IPv6 is the prefered connection method.  As an "end-user", I don't know why Comcast has chosen to give my network MORE address space; like 1800000000000000000+ addresses wasn't enough; they've given me 295000000000000000000+ addresses.

In reality, for an end user network, /96 is plenty with 2^32 addreses, and /112 is even more reasonable with 2^16 addresses;  especially when you compare it to the default settings on every consumer IPv4 gateway with 2^8 addresses.

I found this nice table from IBM on IP address subnet masks: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/ts3500-tape-library?topic=formats-subnet-masks-ipv4-prefixes-ipv6
(its odd that they buried it in a tape library document, but almighty Google found it! - Google KNOWS EVERYTHING!)  :)


Cheers,

Scott


---
* Origin: -={ The Digital Post }=- (1:266/420)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.043063 секунды