= Сообщение: 7006 из 7402 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Tony Langdon 3:633/410 19 Jan 22 18:18:00 Кому : Richard Menedetter 19 Jan 22 18:18:00 Тема : Re: List of IPv6 nodes FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2149.fido-ipv6@3:633/410+264d03ec На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:310/31+61e3f612 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: ASCII ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+61e7f631 ============================================================================== -=> On 01-16-22 11:35, Richard Menedetter wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
TL> There are arguments for more than a /64 for residential use. That TL> allows for different subnets with different security profiles, such as TL> for IoT, the car, whatever other network of smart devices you want. TL> For many, I suspect a /60 would be sufficient.
RM> Sure ... I agree.
RM> My reply was more from the ISP point of view. RM> With 1 v6 subnet it is easy, you just announce the subnet.
RM> If you allow more, you need a way to configure them. (eg. VLANs, RM> different subnet on different LAN port, etc.)
True, and as the market demands it, this will become available (and the vendors will probably screw it up LOL). I know I can add a router behind the primary router. The main manual setup will be to assign a /64 to the LAN side of that router. The existing router will pick up the advertisements, setup routing and optionally open the firewall for that /64 (so that filtering can be controlled by the second router).
I haven't put that to the test yet, but tempted to give it a try sometime, as a learning exercise. :)
RM> That is added complexity for a low cost product, where most of your RM> residential customers will have no clue what this is all about.
If the market demands it, it will come (and in a low cost, easy to use form).
RM> So it makes more sense to offer that on higher tier (and more RM> expensive) services.
I can see that changing. As I said, when separation of functional networks becomes a thing.
