= Сообщение: 5651 из 7402 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Markus Reschke 2:240/1661 02 Aug 18 15:22:04 Кому : Michiel van der Vlist 02 Aug 18 15:22:04 Тема : NANOG 73 FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:240/1661+5b2bac5a На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+5b62f46b = Кодировка сообщения определена как: LATIN1 ================================= Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+5b670754 ============================================================================== Hi Michiel!
Aug 02 14:09 2018, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Markus Reschke:
MvdV> Here are some interesting thoughts about why T-Mobile US went IPv6 MvdV> and others did not (yet).
In case of the large US telcos my take on this is that they are after profit optimization and are trying to invest as less money as possible. Since those telcos have monopolies in most US regions they don't upgrade their networks to make customers happy and provide faster internet access. They will invest only when forced by a competitor. A few days ago New York state voted to throw Charter out of the state for not delivering and lying after their merger with Time Warner. AFAIK this is one of the very rare cases of an US state taking action against a big telco. Back to IPv6. Rolling out IPv6 would require an investment (man power, software, hardware), something the big telcos want to avoid. Their customer service sucks already and a sudden increase of service calls by customers about an IPv6 migration would become a nightmare. As long as it works and makes money there's no reason to spend money for IPv6. And this not just true for the large US telcos but also for tons of other companies.
