= Сообщение: 33 из 7402 =============================================== IPV6 = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 07 Nov 13 11:40:11 Кому : Markus Reschke 07 Nov 13 11:40:11 Тема : FSP-1038.001 FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+527b731f На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:244/1661+527a80d2 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:244/1661+527a80d4 ============================================================================== Hello Markus,
On Wednesday November 06 2013 17:48, you wrote to Stas Degteff:
SD>> FYI, any node with ipv4 MAY connect to IPv6 world using "6to4" SD>> tunnel or teredo or tunnel brocker. IPv6 on my node connected via SD>> 6to4 (address in the subnet 2002::)
MR> Emphasis on "may" ;-) How much nodes are able to manage IPv6 MR> transition mechanisms?
I expect my mother and my neighbour across the street to not be able to set up a tunnel, but then they are not Fidonet sysops. Setting up a Fidonet node requires over above average ability to deal with computers and so I expect that quit a lot of Fdionet sysops will be able to manage.
MR> And we shouldn't rely too much on Teredo since it's future is quite MR> uncertain.
Indeed. It relies on third parties to provide the servers and relays. Plus that - correct me if I am wrong - it is my understanding that Teredo does not work from behind double NAT.
But wait.... We do not need third parties to provide gateways. In Fidonet we already have a mechanism to get messages from one system to another if they can't connect directly. It is called routed mail. Any dual capability node can act as a gateway between IPv4 only and IPv6 only nodes.
