MvV>> IIRC Tony Langdon is using 4in6 tunnels. When IPv6 becomes the MvV>> dominanty protocl - and we may live to see that - using a 4in6 MvV>> tunnel may be better than the other way around.
TL> No, though I do use a VPN to route a /29 of IPv4 to my BBSs. The VPN TL> is running OpenVPN, and is carried on IPv4, not V6, so you're not TL> quite correct,
Ok, so my memory once again failed me. ;-)
TL> though I _could_ theoretically use 4in6.
When IPv6 becomes the dominant protocol 4in6 tunnels may become popular for those still needing incoming IPv4. Until "everyone has IPv6 of course. Then we can switch off IPv4. ;-)
TL> I'm probably a little unusual in that I'm running a VPN tunnel to TL> carry IPv4, while all IPv6 here is native.
Very unusual. Few hobbyists have more than one IPv4 address these days. Having moe than one is unusual by itself. Having them via a VPN is even more unusual. You may be the only one in Fidonet.
