= Сообщение: 6108 из 7402 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Michiel van der Vlist 2:280/5555 02 Aug 19 13:05:35 Кому : Jeff Smith 02 Aug 19 13:05:35 Тема : IP6 Tunnel? FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+5d441d1d На : area://IPV6?msgid=1:282/1031.0+346db319 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=1:282/1031.0+b64fafe5 ============================================================================== Hello Jeff,
On Thursday August 01 2019 09:43, you wrote to me:
>> Are you aware that - if they are on the same LAN - you do not need a >> sepearate tunnel for each node, but that you can have a routed subnet >> (/64 or /48) from he.net and use just one tunnel for all the nodes om >> your LAN?
JS> I had the understanding that the tunnel was related to a static v4 JS> endpoint IP. Here each PC (FTN Node) has it's own static v4 IP. Are JS> you saying that a single tunnel can support multiple static v4 IP JS> endpoints?
The tunnel does not "support" a static IPv4 endpoint. It is more the other way around. A tunnel needs a public IPv4 address for its end point. The same public IPv4 address can be used for other purposes, such as a Fidonet Binkp server. But it need not be. The fact that the tunnel is used to supply an IPv6 address to the same binkd server is irrelevant. The binkp server can be on a different IPv4 address than the tunnel servicing the IPOv6 part.
Yes, for a second tunnel, you need a different public IPv4 address for the end point.
My point is: you probably do not need a second tunnel. A tunnel is a channel to the rest of the world that can handle many IPv6 addresses. Just like an IPv4 router can make you connect many device to the IPv4 internet via a single channel, so can a tunnel for IPv6.
You can assign different IPv6 addresses to 1:282/1031 and 1:14/6 over one and the same tunnel.
How this is done and if it is "better" in your situation is another matter.
