Добро пожаловать, Гость. Пожалуйста авторизуйтесь здесь.
FGHIGate на GaNJa NeTWoRK ST@Ti0N - Просмотр сообщения в эхоконференции IPV6
Введите FGHI ссылку:


Присутствуют сообщения из эхоконференции IPV6 с датами от 31 Jul 11 14:37:00 до 01 Apr 24 00:03:00, всего сообщений: 7402
Ответить на сообщение К списку сообщений Предыдущее сообщение Следующее сообщение
= Сообщение: 7001 из 7402 ============================================= IPV6 =
От   : Michiel van der Vlist            2:280/5555         18 Jan 22 14:06:23
Кому : Alexey Vissarionov                                  18 Jan 22 14:06:23
Тема : List of IPv6 nodes
FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+61e6bdf3
На   : area://IPV6?msgid=2:5020/545+61e49235
= Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP850 ==================================
Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:310/31+61e6c756
==============================================================================
Hello Alexey,

On Monday January 17 2022 00:38, you wrote to Richard Menedetter:

RM>> Sure ... I agree. My reply was more from the ISP point of view.
RM>> With 1 v6 subnet it is easy, you just announce the subnet.

AV> No: when you need to provide the customer with IPv6, you assign one
AV> fixed address for a link, and route a /64 subnet through that address.

AV> Plastic routers (those sold for 20 EUR) deal with this setup just
AV> fine.

My provider issued "plastic box" already uses three subnets all by itself. The first subnet is routed to the local LAN. (WiFi + wired). The second subnet is rserverd for the private guest network. (WiFi only). The third subnet is for the providers own guest network. (WiFi only).

The box supports pefix delegation, so I can connect another router and have more subnets routed to that router.

RM>> If you allow more, you need a way to configure them. (eg. VLANs,
RM>> different subnet on different LAN port, etc.)

AV> Or simply route more /64 subnets through that address. Or /56 at once.

My provider gives me a /56 routed through that "plastic box".

RM>> That is added complexity for a low cost product, where most of
RM>> your residential customers will have no clue what this is all
RM>> about. So it makes more sense to offer that on higher tier (and
RM>> more expensive) services.

AV> That violates the KISS principle.

Indeed. It is easier to just give every customer a /56. And just route the first /64 to the LAN, so that the user need not configure anything if he only needs one /64. And the provider does not need to configure anything if the customer needs more.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
* Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)

К главной странице гейта
Powered by NoSFeRaTU`s FGHIGate
Открытие страницы: 0.045484 секунды