= Сообщение: 6703 из 7402 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Dmitry Protasoff 2:5001/100.1 30 Jun 21 23:17:54 Кому : Victor Sudakov 30 Jun 21 23:17:54 Тема : Two ISPs and backup for a home network (dual-homing) FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:5001/100.1+60dcd6e7 На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:5005/49+60dca972 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=2:5005/49+60ddc5c0 ============================================================================== *** Answering a msg posted in area carbonArea (Carbon Area).
Hello, Victor!
Thursday July 01 2021 00:19, you wrote to me:
DP>> NAT66 is what NAT for ipv6 is called.
VS> What was the incentive to create such an abomination?
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy."(c)Shakespeare
And original ipv6 was just a miserable philosophy, created by people with limited knowledge about real life.
DP>> NPTv6 is not a NAT, it's DP>> stateless solution.
VS> Even if NPT is called "prefix translation" and is stateless, it is VS> still a NAT (in IPv4 terms, a type of a one-to-one NAT).
NPTv6 is for prefix translation only, not for address translation. It's much more lightweight and easy to implement.
VS> However, the creators of IPv6 had better invent something like "dead VS> gateway detection" or some other way for end devices to select a VS> working outgoing address when they have several global prefixes (and VS> gateways) available. I thought my knowledge was lacking, but it turns VS> out the new and flashy protocol stack is lacking.
Do you have a time machine to send some ideas to ipv6 creators? :)
Best regards, dp.
--- GoldED+/W64-MSVC 1.1.5-b20180707 * Origin: No rest for the wicked (2:5001/100.1)
