= Сообщение: 5577 из 7402 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Victor Sudakov 2:5005/49 05 Jul 18 21:59:54 Кому : Benny Pedersen 05 Jul 18 21:59:54 Тема : 2:5057/53 FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:5005/49+5b3e35f9 На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:230/0+5b3dc063 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== ============================================================================== Dear Benny,
05 Jul 18 06:46, you wrote to me:
MvdV>>>> Let's give him and his NC a chance to correct it...
BP>>> it basicly there own problem, but binkp.net should reject ina BP>>> with binkp.net listnings
VS>> Last time I checked, binkp.net did not rely solely on DDN, you VS>> could enter any RR for your node manually via a Web page (which I VS>> did long ago). So if you have created a RR for your node in VS>> binkp.net, there should be no technical problem using a VS>> binkp.net-derived name in the nodelist flags.
BP> i did not know its a webpage aswell, if the web lets users create rr BP> that are not in nodelist, hmm :)
Yes, it does. It started this way. It is very convenient, and works as a regular DNS zone with a Web editor.
Of course, if you try to register at https://binkp.net/ as 2:5005/49, a Netmail with a confirmation code will be sent to 2:5005/49. So it's pretty safe, you can create any RR only for your own node.
VS>> The requirement in FTS-5004
VS>> If the INA flag (or any of the protocol flags) of any node VS>> carries host name built from the FTN address using DDN or any VS>> other method, that node MUST be skipped and MUST NOT appear in VS>> resulting NS zone. In general, such names SHOULD NOT appear in VS>> the nodelist.
BP> +1
VS>> has always seemed technically unfounded (or at least the VS>> unarticulated "any other method" statement) to me. Does it mean VS>> that I can use the INA:fido.sibptus.ru flag all right, but cannot VS>> use the INA:node49.net5005.sibptus.ru flag? Why?
BP> it does not work since binkd only handle single root-domain in BP> binkd.cfg
BP> try in cfg:
I'm not going to put "root-domain sibptus.ru" in binkd's config, that's a silly idea. I mean that a sysop has the right to put any DNS name she finds necessary into the INA flag, no matter if it's derived from the FTN address or not. A nodelist has no concept of "root-domain", a DNS name is just a DNS name.
