VS>> Good point. Thank you. Maybe fc00::/7 has a chance of becoming VS>> the new 192.168/16.
MR> I'd recommend to use fd00::/8 since fc00::/8 was meant to be some kind MR> of globally unique local address space managed by a registry (-> B2B MR> VPNs).
fc00::/7 is from RFC4193, and where is fd00::/8 defined?
VS>> I don't think enterprise-class firewalls have UPnP, do they?
MR> Most don't. But you never know what e-junk some company uses. >:)
VS>> And thinking about SOHO and home routers/firewalls, what kind of VS>> IPv6 connectivity are they going to have, what do you think? VS>> Those present who have native IPv6 connectivity, what's your VS>> ISP's policy on assigning addresses to customers?
MR> /64 as xfer network and a /56 for the LAN (both dynamic, forced change MR> every 6 months).
If you want a static address?
VS>> Interesting. Do you know of any implementations that could VS>> translate ULA addresses into one global /64 pool?
MR> Cisco, Juniper, Linux, ... MR> However, you need to check the details for each box and firmware. For MR> example, Linux can hide the complete LAN behind a single IPv6 address.
