= Сообщение: 6785 из 7402 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Victor Sudakov 2:5005/49 16 Sep 21 19:59:38 Кому : Michiel van der Vlist 16 Sep 21 19:59:38 Тема : Unifi FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:5005/49+61433fdf На : area://IPV6?msgid=2:280/5555+6141e290 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== ============================================================================== Dear Michiel,
15 Sep 21 14:02, you wrote to me:
BR>>> You can always get a tunneled IPv6 block free from HE.net and BR>>> tell your ISP to piss off. That's what I basically did and I've BR>>> been fine since.
VS>> That's what I've done, but it results in a lower bandwidth over VS>> IPv6, and extra hops.
MV> A tunnel is good, native IPv6 is better. I noticed it too when I used MV> tunnels. IPv6 over the tunnel is significantky slower than IPv4. Up to MV> 50% slower. Native IPv6 is always preferable so we we should all keep MV> perstering our ISPs about IPv6.
I fully agree.
VS>> The bandwidth is so much lower that browsers tend to fall back to VS>> IPv4
MV> I haven't seen that particular problem.
Please see my reply to Brian.
VS>> (Yes I know there is a tweak to stop this behaviour in Firefox, VS>> nevertheless my IPv6 connection is inferior to IPv4).
MV> As I said: native is preferable, but a tunnel is better than no IPv6 MV> at all.
