= Сообщение: 5582 из 7402 ============================================= IPV6 = От : Ivan Kovalenko 2:5057/53 09 Jul 18 14:28:16 Кому : mark lewis 09 Jul 18 14:28:16 Тема : 2:5057/53 FGHI : area://IPV6?msgid=2:5057/53+5b433af8 На : area://IPV6?msgid=1:3634/12.73+5b3ffc36 = Кодировка сообщения определена как: CP866 ================================== Ответ: area://IPV6?msgid=1:3634/12.73+5b43b89a ============================================================================== Hello, mark.
06 Jul 18 19:25, you wrote to Benny Pedersen:
VS>>> that I can use the INA:fido.sibptus.ru flag all right, but VS>>> cannot use the INA:node49.net5005.sibptus.ru flag? Why?
BP>> it does not work since binkd only handle single root-domain in BP>> binkd.cfg
ml> binkd.conf does allow for different lookup domains... simply specify ml> them on the domain line...
ml> the real question is if the FTN othernets provide DNS zone lookups for ml> their networks that binkp.net provides for fidonet...
BP>> try in cfg: BP>> root-domain sibptus.ru
ml> comment that out and never use it again...
Does this mean that the requirement of FTS-5004 to exclude nodes which have INA flag referring to a fN.nN.zN.example.org domain is a bit phony? To me, it sounds so, as the legacy software doesn't (and it obviously can't) rely on it, while it solely serves to help IP nodes reaching each other.
Let me allow to quote its few statements:
(a) "The fidonet.net domain however was lost for the Fidonet community in 2011 when the keeper allowed it to expire."
(b) "...it is strongly recommended that implementations that make use of a DDN service allow the user to easily configure the root domain and to configure overrides for often used stationary links..."
Keeping in mind quoted above, this one
"If the INA flag (or any of the protocol flags) of any node carries host name built from the FTN address using DDN or any other method, that node MUST be skipped and MUST NOT appear in resulting NS zone. In general, such names SHOULD NOT appear in the nodelist."
doesn't really look good, since as stated in (a), nobody in Fidonet is able to get the proper domain name anymore, and (b) we're now on our own. Hence that, it's merely a question of proper implementation and its configuration.
So, for the resume (though I guess this is the question for Alexey Vissarionov) -- what's the big difference, on my own example, between f53.n5057.z2.binkp.net and fido.roswell.systems ?
Best regards, Ivan.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20130515 * Origin: Area 51 (2:5057/53)
